Image: Nat W/Flickr
What is the first what comes to mind, when we hear the words: enterprise software? It is likely something bulky, cumbersome, weighty, hard to use, and our productive flow something that alludes to the drudgery of a job where software seems to promote as opposed to block it. Might be able to it compared to, in the middle of some fun activity, such as with a new love interest depend on and suddenly your ex in and raises a strict look your way, making the smile slowly slip away from your face.
Blunt user interfaces (UIs) have their rank list for consumer and entertainment applications, which are smooth, streamlined and provide fresh content to the swipe of a finger lost; but enterprise software does not arise. Sometimes it even seems that this dinosaur-like UIs never will disappear, wishful thinking: finally make them extinct?
Ridicule aside, much talk for some time about how uncomfortable UIs of enterprise software are, and as providers should begin to seek more sympathetic UIs. No "should" in this world turn into action, unless, there are some main plant bridged dynamics that make it possible, and that is exactly why we need to make these improvements.
We take an X-ray vision in the heart of the matter, why we need a better UX? It's a pleasure, aesthetic enjoyment, or for a feeling of comfort and continuous flow? What is the key element that will dictate development of a better UX?
This primary incentive called greed for speed. We are pushed away from the era of the decades-long projects and year-round rollouts of infrastructure, obnoxious RFP-based adoptions, from the top of an organization down the tube. Companies, the enterprise software it wants to flexible, adaptable and quick to update in line with rapidly changing social, technology and business trends. Enterprise software vendors must necessarily on these needs and provide a better UX, user flow action make, simple and intuitive, as well as shortening the time required, get all kinds of reports from the companies large amounts of data.
Focus on visualization would be a prerequisite for these "accelerated" UX. The enterprise software of the year 2014 and beyond has no place for slowness and UX in enterprise applications is a part of a larger picture with many facets. In short, feedback-based development is mainstream for companies, require the faster rollouts, rapid scalability, faster adoption and ease-of-use. There is no time for pompous presentations or heavy load training, where to learn how to use a software, mulling over the scholastic text resembles.
An example of a positive UX development in the enterprise world, that would be Google, of course that comes with their cloud services have offered another example, always a smooth UX my opinion is Salesforce. You do better to make a real effort, UX for their end users. Enhanced context-sensitive help, facilitates the "How to what do" - questions, finding answers and has a new look to the user interface. Considering the fact that people who enter the sales data, has generally cleaner and easier to use it, that Salesforce is the baby of the 1990s, both for the executives, working with the reports that are generated from this data.
So, if Google and Salesforce company marching ahead as pioneers of this company UX movement, such as about the mammoth? What is the dynamics of the main operating system, which eventually would provide a smooth UX to a user of the software in the average enterprise ERP, supply chain management and project portfolio management bridged?
The fireballs are enterprise start-ups to ignite these changes. A start-up company is a company that would create a new generation of easy to think easy roll-out and can easily use of enterprise software, organisations get the most of their large data from an analytical perspective and day-to-day adjustments quickly to support. In the middle of 2000 we have an outbreak of start-ups, the of backward bent to entertain the hell out of everyone. Start ups at that time share, social exchange or Gamification photo. But we have only so many resources and time for entertainment.
Some people want to not overshare, particularly at the workplace. Adolescents and young people spend lot of time with entertainment apps, but they are not those who spend money on software. For software vendors are serious companies, who are willing to pay sharp, stable and fast enterprise products for new, beautiful, more relevant. Start-ups would better improve the security and reliability of cloud advise, if the power of her genius not any viral International dating app, but would work to a software that help people apply, more quickly and with comfort.
It may take years, but fresh-start-ups the paradigm of enterprise UX changes companies, as that makes competitive, old school, so reluctant to their overgrown garden weed. It reminds me of Newton's first law of motion: "an object at rest will remain at rest... unless followed by an unbalanced force." In case of company UX unbalanced this force - read new technology (cloud and mobile) + change, economic and social environment (need for speed) - requires start ups for this change to get involved. The ball is already rolling.
It helps not to bombard with call established software companies to update their UX and to make more usable. In most cases, they would weigh for a facelift UX vs. keeping costs profits from new business or old customers and to decide. Things will change, how does the new unbalanced, come the enterprise start ups in the game. The conservatives could have expected with them then, either newly invent and their identity, steering the updates (not an easy thing to do), needed for their software or from the game.
Olga Kouzina is author in TargetProcess.
Pass this entry about the full-text RSS service — if this your content and you read it on a third-party website, please read the FAQ on fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.
